Category — ADHD: Ritalin

A study published in the June 14 edition of the Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics has sparked controversy regarding ADHD medication and the brain’s power to regulate itself.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and conducted by Dr. Adrian Sandler, a developmental-behavioral pediatrician and medical director of the Olson Huff Center for Child Development at Mission Children’s Hospital in Asheville, North Carolina.  The research was performed over the course of eight years using 99 patients from Western North Carolina.

Sandler found that children with ADHD can do just as well on half their medication when the medication is combined with a placebo. They performed as well even when parents and children had full knowledge they were taking a placebo.

[Placebo --  A substance containing no medication and prescribed or given to reinforce a patient's expectation to get well. The placebo in this research was akin to a harmless inert pill].

Previous studies have shown that common stimulant medication causes side-effects like tics, weight loss, stunted growth, and even heart complications in some instances. This often causes trepidation in parents afraid of the possible side-effects on their children.

Sandler compared fully medicated children, children on reduced medication, and children on reduced medication with a known placebo. The results were quite intriguing.  Both the fully medicated and reduced medication groups had increased side-effects while the reduced medication with placebo demonstrated decreased side-effects. Furthermore, the reduced medication group reported decreased control of their ADHD symptoms. However, the control of ADHD symptoms was no different in the reduced medication with placebo group than in the full dose group, i.e. the reduced medication with placebo performed as well as the fully medicated group with less side-effects as well.

“I’ve been getting a lot of calls and e-mails,” said Sandler,, who conducted the research with James Bodfish, a professor in the departments of psychiatry and pediatrics at UNC Chapel Hill School of Medicine, and study coordinator Corrine Glesne.

“Medications work,” Bodfish said in a statement. “The question is whether we always need to use them at the highest dose. Many parents are concerned about placing their child on medication. Some choose not to treat their child because of concerns about side effects.”

While the research doesn’t address it, the obvious question is, Why? Parents and children in this study knew they were taking a placebo. Why then did they perform as well as their peers without the side-effects — at essentially half the dose as their peers? While the placebo effect has been studied widely, the exact mechanisms are unknown. We do know that the mechanism is governed by the brain. This clearly tells us that having ADHD or not, our brain is still a powerful weapon in our arsenal.

We also cannot exclude the influence of the parents during this research. Did they expect their child to do better? The authors suggest that this was so. This dynamic cannot be overlooked in your family either.

The bottom line is that we likely have far more control over our behaviors and cognitive processes than we are given credit for. Modern medicine, as this research suggests, is just beginning to understand the brain’s role in shaping our lives. We’ve known this for years at Play Attention. Cognitive training. Memory training. Motor skills. Attention training. Behavioral shaping. It’s time to take control over our lives. We’ve all got the power to do it. It lies right behind our eyes.

If I told you that women who received only basic education were 130 % more likely to have a child on ADHD medication than women with university degrees, you’d see a link, wouldn’t you? 

Well, that’s what a  study published this month in Acta Paediatrica found.  That implies that nearly half of the serious cases of ADHD  in children are closely tied to social factors. The study reveals that factors like single parenting and poor maternal education were directly tied to ADHD medication use.

While we know that a genetic propensity likely exists, the human brain develops based on a complex interplay between nature and nurture; between genetic endowment (nature) and environment/social factors (nurture). Epigenetic theory tries to explain this relationship.

Curiously, few large-scale studies have tried to determine the impact of social and family influences on ADHD. Researchers at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden assessed data on 1.16 million school children and examined the health histories of nearly 8,000 Swedish-born kids, aged six to 19, who had taken ADHD medication.

"We tracked their record through other registers … to determine a number of other factors," said lead author Anders Hjern.

Here’s what the researchers found:

• Living in a single parent family increased the chances of being on ADHD medication by more than 50 percent.
• A family on welfare upped the odds of medication use by 135%.
• Boys were three times more likely to be on medication than girls.
• Social dynamics affected both sexes equally.

"Almost half of the cases could be explained by the socioeconomic factors included in our analysis, clearly demonstrating that these are potent predictors of ADHD-medication in Swedish school children," Hjern said.

It’s clear that this study found a link between socioeconomic factors and ADHD medication use/diagnosis. Other US studies have found that minority children and children of low socioeconomic status were more likely to receive ADHD medication.

Factors like low income and diminished quality time are more common in single-parent families. These typically lead to stressors like family conflict and a lack of social support, Hjern said.

While more research must be done, one has to ask, is medication the answer to social stressors like lack of time and money? Sounds too silly to ask, but it seems that our answer, ridiculously, is a resounding, YES!

We are the masters of our lives. We can make significant personal changes, but we must have the tools to do so. That’s why I began Play Attention (www.playattention.com) years ago.

A Nottingham University research team in the United Kingdom found that the brains of children with ADHD appear to respond to immediate rewards in the same way as they do to medication. Their research was published in the journal Biological Psychiatry.

“Our study suggests that both types of intervention [medicine and immediate reward/reinforcement] may have much in common in terms of their effect on the brain,” said Professor Chris Hollis, the lead investigator of  the study.

The research team used an EEG (electroencephalograph) to measure the brain activity of children as they played a computer game that provided extra points for less impulsive behavior.

The researchers devised a computer space game which rewarded the ADHD children when they caught aliens of specific colors  while avoiding aliens of designated colors. The game design actually tested the children’s ability to resist the impulse to grab the wrong colored aliens.

To test whether immediate reward/reinforcement made a difference, one iteration of the game rewarded the children fivefold for catching the right alien and penalized them fivefold for catching the wrong one.  All of this was done while activity in different parts of their brains was monitored with an EEG.

Hollis found that the immediate rewards helped the children perform better at the game. This was verified by the EEG which  revealed that both medication and immediate reward/reinforcement were "normalizing" brain activity in the same regions.

Many parents of ADHD children are aware that giving a reward to an ADHD child a week after their good behavior is insignificant to that child. ADHD children respond better to immediate reward, not delayed reward.

"Although medication and behavior therapy appear to be two very different approaches of treating ADHD, our study suggests that both types of intervention may have much in common in terms of their effect on the brain. Both help normalize similar components of brain function and improve performance,"  said Hollis.

"We know that children with ADHD respond disproportionately less well to delayed rewards – this could mean that in the ‘real world’ of the classroom or home, the neural effects of behavioral approaches using reinforcement and rewards may be less effective."

It’s obvious that providing immediate rewards/reinforcement 24 hours a day and 7 days a week would be impractical and impossible. But what does this research tell us? It tells us that if we are to train an ADHD student, feedback, reward, and reinforcement need to be immediate if we are to get their brain to rewire.

We at Play Attention have known this for many years. This is why we integrated immediate feedback/reinforcement for attention training, cognitive training, memory training, and behavioral shaping by using feedback technology. We patented this method years ago because of its inherent strength. While we knew this was the best way to achieve success, we feel research like this rather reinforces our approach. It’s about time the world caught up!

  The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA. 2009;302(10):1084-1091) recently published work by Dr. Nora D. Volkow, MD, et al regarding evaluation of the biological bases that may reveal a reward/motivational deficit present in the brains of persons with ADHD.

Volkow and her colleagues theorized that ADHD may be connected to reward-motivation deficits. Volkow investigated whether lack of motivation and its relationship to reward could be traced to depression of dopamine in various areas of the brain.

To determine whether dopamine was depressed in ADHD persons, the researchers used positron emission tomography (PET scans) to measure dopamine levels in 53 nonmedicated ADHD adults and 44 healthy non ADHD adults between 2001-2009.

Since the biological mechanisms of ADHD are unknown, studies of this type have become the holy grails of research. While Volkow’s credentials are quite impressive (NIH, NIDA, etc.) this research is not new or conclusive. The theory that dopamine dysfunction/depression may be involved with ADHD symptoms has been researched for many years.

Furthermore, Volkow’s  small sample size consisted only of adults and therefore should not be extrapolated to include the child population. The small sample size alone should prevent it from being generalized to the entire adult ADHD population. One has a problem of antecedence here; is ADHD caused by dopamine depression in the brain? Or is the dopamine depression the result of ADHD that was acquired by other biological means? This research cannot answer that question.

What does the research tell us? It tells us that for some adults, dopamine may play a role in ADHD. For those adults, taking a stimulant medication may increase dopaminergic activity thus increasing reward/motivation responses and thus increasing attention to task. That might be a stretch.

On the downside, persons with depressed dopamine levels would probably greatly enjoy using stimulants. Study participants reported this. This may contribute to the frequent incidences of substance abuse among ADHD persons.

The authors write,"Despite decades of research, the specific neurobiological mechanisms underlying this disorder still remain unclear. Genetic, clinical and imaging studies point to a disruption of the brain dopamine system, which is corroborated by the clinical effectiveness of stimulant drugs (methylphenidate hydrochloride and amphetamine), which increase extracellular dopamine in the brain."

Unfortunately, the study leaves us with more questions than answers. Does it tell us what happens long term? Does it tell us of side effects?  Does it tell us if this actually applies to children? Can we conclusively determine a causal relationship between reward/motivation and ADHD? Does it solve the problem of antecedence? Do we know anything conclusively about all ADHD adults. No. There’s still a long road ahead.

While the topic of nutrition & ADHD is contentious, omega 3s have gained ground in the relief of ADHD symptoms.  

Respectable studies from Goteborg University in Sweden, University of South Australia, and Oxford University in the United Kingdom have shown that omega 3 fatty acids have reduced symptoms by as much as 50%. A more recent Norwegian study produced similar results. 

In the study performed at the University of South Australia, children were divided randomly into three groups for the first 15 weeks of the study. One group was given a fish oil & primrose oil combination; the second took the same combination plus a multivitamin/mineral supplement, and the third group took a placebo. During the second 15 weeks, the kids on the placebo were given the fish oil & primrose oil combination plus the multivitamin/mineral as well.

While the studies received little press, the results were quite good for the two 30-week fish-oil groups. They demonstrated 40%- 50% improvement in behavior while the 15-week group showed a 30% – 40% percent improvement.  

Ritalin and Concerta are the drugs most often prescribed for ADHD. The results actually were far better for fish oil when compared with results of studies of Ritalin and Concerta. Fish oils were more effective.

Let me make it clear that fish oil will not cure ADHD. Could it possibly mitigate symptoms for you? Possibly. According to Dr. Andrew Weil  “Levels of omega-3s in the plasma and red blood cells of children with ADHD are lower than in kids who don’t have the disorder.”

As attention issues are only the tip of the ADHD iceberg, it’s not a good idea to use fish oils as your only intervention. I strongly recommend using Play Attention; a cognitive program to improve attention, memory, visual tracking, time on-task, motor skills, and discriminatory processing.

A recent study by Dr. Andrea Chronis-Tuscano of the University of Maryland published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry indicates that mothers taking a long-acting form of Ritalin can become better parents.

I’ll be honest, it’s studies like these that turn my stomach. The University of  Maryland should be ashamed of producing such hogwash.

“Mothers of children with ADHD are at 24-times increased risk of having the disorder themselves, and recent research shows that adult ADHD impairs parenting,” Chronis-Tuscano said in an interview with Reuters Health. “However, no study until this one has examined whether medicating parents for their ADHD improves parenting.”

Tuscano used a small group of 23 mothers who received either Ritalin or a placebo. The study ran only 7 weeks.  Researchers assessed mothers’ ADHD symptoms and its affect on the mothers’ parenting skills. Side effects of medication were studied as well.

The results: Ritalin was better than placebo at improving ADHD symptoms and parenting behaviors. As the researchers increased the mothers’ dosages, the mothers’ inattention and hyperactivity fell. The mothers’ parenting behaviors improved, became more consistent, and they did not subject their children to corporal punishment (spanking) as much.

These results prompted Chronis-Tuscano to say, that there is likely “a need for behavioral interventions that target impairments in parenting among adults with ADHD.”

Studies like these are very frequently funded by the pharmaceutical industry. University professors are under pressure to publish and are quite amenable to studies like these even though it’s little more than propaganda and trash data.

It has been clearly established that low dose stimulant medication produces virtually the same effect in both ADHD and non-ADHD patients: it increases one’s ability to pay attention to boring tasks – ADHD or not. This is why these medications are highly desirable to high school students and college students.

Both the tone and tenor of this type of research leads us to think something new has been discovered, when indeed it has not. It also leads us to believe that we can become better parents if we take a pill. We know from previous research that training parents is the best intervention for ADHD children. This ranks above medication. It is the recommended course of action in the United Kingdom although it has not been adopted in the US yet.

If we have ADHD, are parents, and have kids with ADHD (possibly a genetic link),  we can be taught coping skills, consistent parenting skills, and appropriate disciplinary methods. Is this more difficult than taking a pill that teaches nothing and works only in the short-term? Yes. Is it better in the long run? Yes.

Generics don’t produce income for the pharma giants. Giant pharma’s manipulation of pricing affects users – perhaps more now that the economy is a mess. It also affects health and health related decisions. Ethically, this is wrong.

Shire hikes Adderall price as rumors fly

Amid new speculation that Pfizer might snag Shire in a buyout deal, the specialty pharma is following through on its strategy to switch patients to its newest ADHD med Vyvanse as blockbuster Adderall XR nears the end of its patent. Shire is hiking the price of Adderall by 20 percent, a boost that confounded analysts expecting a smaller increase.

The idea, of course, is that by making Adderall more expensive, Shire will shine the spotlight on Vyvanse, whose price is rising by a mere 7 percent. Cost-conscious patients will then switch to the cheaper brand, or so the theory goes. Then, firmly entrenched as Vyvanse users, the patients won’t move to generic Adderall when it hits the market.

Analysts apparently expect the switching to stick; Citigroup upgraded Shire stock on the prospect. But with insurers increasingly vigilant about drug prices, generic Adderall might woo away more Vyvanse users than Shire wants to lose. We’ll have to wait and see how that plays out.

In the meantime, though, investors are bidding up Shire stock on fresh rumors that Pfizer is kicking tires there. The U.K. company surfaces as a rumored Pfizer target from time to time, however, so it’s tough to know whether Pfizer is actually looking, or whether the habitual talk simply got stirred up when Pfizer chief Jeff Kindler made his “open to big deals” statement earlier this week.

The Denver Post (www.denverpost.com) reports that Boulder police arrested three teens on felony charges of distribution and possession of a schedule II controlled substance. The incidence occurred on April 4 at Nevin Platt Middle School where the youth attended school.

Apparently one student had the drugs, gave one to another student who swallowed it and was taken ill. The sick student was then taken to the hospital and released. Other students were involved in the safekeeping of the drugs after they were brought to school.

The student that brought the drugs (Strattera and Concerta for treatment of ADHD) attempted to trade the drugs for alcohol.

The Denver Post says,

Two of the students have been charged with distribution and possession of a schedule II controlled substance and unlawful acts while the third was charged with possession of a controlled substance and unlawful act. Possession and distribution of a schedule II controlled substance is a felony, officials said.

While these students were apprehended, the incidence of ADHD drug sales and use is quite common among students at middle school, high school, and university.

The New York Times (www.nytimes.com) reported in 2005 in an article called The Adderall Advantage that:

At many colleges across the country, the ingredients for academic success now include a steady flow of analeptics, the class of prescription amphetamines that is used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD].

Since Ritalin abuse first hit the radar screen several years ago, the reliance on prescription stimulants to enhance performance has risen, becoming almost as commonplace as No-Doz, Red Bull and maybe even caffeine. As many as 20 percent of college students have used Ritalin or Adderall to study, write papers and take exams, according to recent surveys focused on individual campuses. A study released this month by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia found that the number of teenagers who admit to abusing prescription medications tripled from 1992 to 2003, while in the general population such abuse had doubled.

Dr. Robert A. Winfield, director of University Health Service at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, sees a growing number of students who falsely claim to be A.D.H.D. so they can get a prescription. At least once a week, a jittery, frightened, sleep-deprived student who has taken too many tablets for too many days shows up at his office. “Things have really gotten out of hand in the last four to five years,” he said. “Students have become convinced that this will help them achieve academic success.”

On campus, the drugs are either sold or given away by people with prescriptions, or they are procured by students who have learned to navigate the psychiatric exams offered by campus health centers, which usually provide the drugs at a discount. Unlike Ritalin, two newer members of the family of analeptics – Adderall and Concerta – come in time-release forms and can keep a patient medicated an entire day.

Louisiana State’s The Daily Reveille (www. media.www.lsureveille.com) reported that a survey documented in the journal Nature cites that one in five students used Adderall & Ritalin for a study booster.

Final exams traditionally have students studying long hours to cram for their final exams. But some students are now using a quick-fix for brain retention.

One in five respondents of adult professionals said they have used drugs to enhance brain power, according to a January survey in Nature journal. The online survey polled 1,400 people in 60 countries.

Ritalin and Adderall were the two drugs participants said they took.

Ritalin and Adderall are commonly used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. They are also used to treat symptoms of narcolepsy and chronic fatigue syndrome. The stimulants are supposed to reduce impulsive behavior and facilitate concentration.

But people diagnosed with ADHD are not the only ones who can benefit from the drugs.

“It does work [for anyone]. We know that from lab studies,” said Martha Farah, director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania, according to CNN.com

This is an international phenomenon. The reason is that low-dose stimulant medication is not a targeted approach to fixing ADHD. Instead, low-dose stimulant medication works the same for non-ADHD students. Here’s an example: if we have 50 ADHD students and 50 high functioning non-ADHD students, give them both a boring task, the both will perform better on that task.

Students know this and it helps the cram for exams. Will it help to prosecute all these students under felony charges? Not likely.

Long-Term Safety Questioned of Ritalin

In research published in Pediatrics, [December 2007; vol 120: pp 1494-1501], lead author, Almut G. Winterstein, PhD, assistant professor of pharmacy health care administration, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Jacksonville, found that common stimulants used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) don’t often cause serious heart complications in children. However, she warns that their safety is undetermined for prolonged use.

Winterstein found that stimulants such as Ritalin, Adderall, and Concerta frequently raise blood pressure and heart rate. The researchers analyzed health records from 55,000 children and teens newly diagnosed with ADHD from 1994 to 2004 with two significant findings:

1. Children who used stimulant medication had a 20% increase in visits to hospital ERs or doctors’ offices for heart palpitations and racing heartbeat, compared with children who didn’t use stimulant medication.
2. Stimulant medications did not appear to be associated with an increase in hospitalizations or deaths due to cardiac causes.

Last year the FDA took a special interest in the matter of heart safety when it announced a special Black Box advisory to be placed on stimulant medication. This was in part due to reports of the sudden deaths of 12 children who used ADHD Drug, Adderall.

The Canadian government quickly suspended sales of Adderall XR in Canada, but later permitted sales after further investigation.

Winterstein, PhD, in an interview with WebMD, notes:

… that because serious cardiac events are so rare among children and teens, a much larger study is needed to confirm the safety of these drugs.

“We can’t really say that there is no increase in risk (for serious cardiac events) among children who take these drugs,” she says. “What we can say is that if there is an increase in risk, it will not affect a large number of children.”

ADHD Drugs and Heart Risk

The CDC estimates that 4.4 million children between the ages of 4 and 17 have been diagnosed with ADHD, and as of 2003, 2.5 million were taking medication for it.

Children are increasingly taking the drugs for longer and longer periods, but little is known about their long-term cardiovascular impact, Winterstein says.

“The average exposure in our study was two years, but we see children who are on these drugs for five years, 10 years, and even longer,” she says.

She adds that it is also not clear if the drugs are safe for children with existing heart problems or with risk factors for heart disease.

ADHD does not seem to be a condition like pregnancy where one is either pregnant or one is not. Rather it is a matter of degree. Some children and adults range from mildly inattentive to profoundly inattentive. The degree seems to be directly affected by a variety of environmental factors including divorce, parenting skills, etc. More frequently than not, drugs are prescribed to allay the symptoms. Obviously, they do not affect core issues that affect the child like divorce, marital discord, or learning disabilities.

Study finds divorce increases Ritalin use in children

HELEN BRANSWELL
Canadian Press
June 4, 2007 at 8:46 PM EDT

TORONTO — Children whose parents divorce are nearly twice as likely to be prescribed Ritalin in the aftermath of the split, a Canadian study reports.

But the author, a sociologist from the University of Alberta, cautioned against concluding that children of divorce are over-prescribed the drug, which is used to treat Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD.

Lisa Strohschein said the data she used can only identify the phenomenon and cannot reveal why Ritalin use rates are double when children of divorced parents are compared to children whose parents stay married.

“I’ve got the what, but not the why,” Ms. Strohschein said from Edmonton.

Ms. Strohschein suggests there may be a variety of answers. Some kids may need the drug to cope with the stress of the split, some kids may have ADHD and some kids may be getting a drug they don’t really need.

“The problem is I can’t be clear about it,” she said.

“I mean, I would love to be able to say ‘Yes, it’s divorce. That’s the problem,’ But it’s not necessarily so. It could just be our perceptions about divorce — and that’s the thing that makes me really cautious here.”

“(But) I don’t want to come out on the other side, either and say ‘Ritalin is bad’ because I think it clearly does help some kids.”

The psychiatrist-in-chief of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto said the study should serve as a reminder to doctors to move cautiously when prescribing Ritalin or other methylphenidate-based drugs to children in these circumstances.

“What we need is a deeper understanding of this issue, at the level of the primary care practitioners,” said Dr. Abel Ickowicz.

“Because . . . if we are going too quick to prescribe medication, like Ritalin, like methylphenidate, we may not only be masking the normal process of adaptation to divorce, but we may be contributing to the degree of distress the children of divorce are experiencing.”

The study, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, used data gathered by Statistics Canada through its National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. The survey, which was first conducted in 1994, is completed every two years; Ms. Strohschein used data collected between 1994 and 2000.

Previous researchers had identified the fact that children who live in a household with only one parent or with a parent-step-parent combination were more likely to be on Ritalin than children growing up in households with both parents.

But it wasn’t clear whether the increased use was among all children in a single-parent household — in other words, children whose parents had divorced, children who had lost a parent to death and children born to a single mother — or whether some subset of these children was more heavily prescribed the drug.

Ms. Strohschein compared prescription rates among 4,151 children whose parents hadn’t divorced and 633 children who had. She found that 3.3 per cent of children in the two-parent families were prescribed Ritalin; among the children whose parents had divorced, that figure rose to 6.1 per cent.

The study notes a number of potential explanations for the doubling of the usage rate.

One possibility is that the stress of the divorce aggravated a child’s existing behavioural problems to the point where Ritalin would actually be helpful, she hypothesized.

It is known that ADHD can run in families. In addition to passing on the condition to their children, parents with ADHD-type behaviour might be more likely to divorce — a theory that points towards appropriate use of the drug.

Another possibility is that in divorce, the natural emotions children experience — anxiety, sadness, anger — may manifest themselves in behaviour that is mislabeled as ADHD-like, or that parents and doctors may be anticipating problematic behaviour because of the stress of divorce. The study suggested this type of rationale would reflect inappropriate use.

Dr. Anton Miller, a developmental pediatrician and child health researcher at the University of British Columbia’s Centre for Community Child Health Research, said it’s possible no single answer applies across the board for these children.

“None of them is an outlandish kind of suggestion. They probably all have some validity,” he said.

“It’s certainly possible in some instances that ADHD might have been prematurely diagnosed…. But I would caution anybody (against) saying ‘Well that’s why all these children are getting medication.’ “

“But there is a possibility that in a proportion of the cases we need to try and figure out how much that does happen in the real world and try and advocate … for children to have thorough and really in-depth assessments for these kinds of behaviour and emotional problems.”

Ms. Strohschein agreed: “I think the take-home message is just to be careful not to make that broad assumption that kids must necessarily be doing poorly when their parents divorce. Some kids will do better, some kids will do worse.”